Masculinity and the Body: How African American and White Men Experience Cancer Screening Exams Involving the Rectum

Author:

Winterich Julie A.1,Quandt Sara A.2,Grzywacz Joseph G.3,Clark Peter E.4,Miller David P.5,Acuña Joshua3,Arcury Thomas A.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family & Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

2. Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, North Carolina

3. Department of Family & Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, North Carolina

4. Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

5. Department of Internal Medicine ,Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Abstract

Past research on prostate and colorectal cancer disparities finds that barriers to screening, such as embarrassment and offensiveness, are often reported. Yet none of this literature investigates why. This study uses masculinity and health theory to examine how men experience two common screenings: digital rectal exams (DREs) and colonoscopies. In-depth interviews were conducted with 64 African American and White men from diverse backgrounds, aged 40 to 64, from North Carolina. Regardless of race or education, men experienced DREs more negatively than colonoscopies because penetration with a finger was associated with a gay sexual act. Some men disliked colonoscopies, however, because they associated any penetration as an affront to their masculinity. Because beliefs did not differ by race, future research should focus on structural issues to examine why disparities persist with prostate and colorectal cancer. Recommendations are provided for educational programs and physicians to improve men’s experiences with exams that involve the rectum.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3