Validation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Tests — Past and Present Strategies

Author:

Ekwall Björn1,Bondesson Inger2,Hellberg Sven3,Högberg Johan4,Romert Lennart5,Stenberg Kjell6,Walum Erik7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Toxicology, Biomedical Center, University of Uppsala, Box 594, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden

2. Swedish Poison Information Center, Karolinska Hospital, Box 60500, S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden

3. Research Group for Chemometrics, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

4. National Institute of Occupational Health, Ekelundsvägen 16, S-171 63 Solna, Sweden

5. Department of Genetic and Cellular Toxicology, Wallenberg Laboratory, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

6. Department of Medical Radiobiology, Karolinska Hospital, S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden

7. Department of Neurochemistry and Neurotoxicology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

In recent years, conventional toxicity testing in animals has been reinforced by in vitro methods. As a result, toxicity testing in some sectors has become more effective and at the same time more ethical. This trend is probably only at its beginning, as many of the newly-developed methods have not yet won general acceptance as a basis for the large-scale replacement and reduction of animal experimentation. What limits the wider use of these methods is validation, i.e. the evaluation of their reliability and relevance. The present paper is a short review of the validation efforts made hitherto, including projects being planned and under discussion. Our own MEIC approach is compared with other strategies. Finally, our opinion on the effectiveness of one large consensus project relative to several different smaller validation programmes is expressed — we advocate the latter strategy, because it will save time and reduce costs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Toxicology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3