Qualitative and Statistical Impacts of Home Language on Responses to the Items of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa

Author:

Abrahams F.1,Mauer K.F.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Psychology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7537, South Africa

2. Department of Industrial Psychology, University of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

Abstract

The primary aims of the study were to compare the responses of different population groups to the items of the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire, and also to explore some of the reasons for the observed differences. One quantitative and two qualitative studies were conducted in the process. For the quantitative study, 983 students of psychology or industrial psychology from four South African universities participated in the study. For the qualitative study, two samples were used, namely 71 second-year students and 10 honours-degree students from the Department of Industrial Psychology of the University of the Western Cape. To test for statistically different response patterns between the groups on each of the items, chi-squared tests were used. The findings showed that serious problems existed as far as the comparability of the items across groups was concerned, that participants whose home language was neither English nor Afrikaans experienced critical difficulties in understanding many of the words that would, as a rule, be regarded as rudimentary by English mother-tongue speakers, and also that the manner in which the items had been constructed impeded the comprehension of respondents who did not speak English as a first language. It would appear that the observed language difficulties may be associated with a number of socio-political and educational factors, but, based on the present results, it was not possible to uncover tenable explanations of some of the differences which are not so clearly bound to language issues. Nonetheless, the nature of the findings should be interpreted to sound a clear warning against the use of the test.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3