Do Pull-In Programs Foster Teacher Collaboration?

Author:

Meyers Joel1,Gelzheiser Lynn M.2,Yelich Glenn3

Affiliation:

1. Joel Meyers is professor in the Department of Educational Psychology and Statistics and director of the Programs in School Psychology at the State University of New York at Albany. He received his PhD from the University of Texas, Austin. Dr. Meyers has published on topics such as school-based consultation, alternative approaches to assessment, mainstreaming, and the primary prevention of learning and adjustment problems in children.

2. Lynn M. Gelzheiser isassociate professor in the Department of Educational Psychology and Statistics and the Special Education Program at the State University of New York at Albany. She obtained her EdD from Teachers College, Columbia University. Her research interests include mainstreaming students with mild handicaps and appropriate instruction for students with LD.

3. Glenn Yelich is a school psychologist in the Bethlehem Central School District, Delmar, New York. He obtuined his PsyD from the State University of New York at Albany. His current professional interests include curriculum-based measurement and school change. Address: Joel Meyers, Programs in School Psychology, ED 232, SUNY-Albany, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12222.

Abstract

This investigation examined classroom teachers' perceptions of collaborative planning meetings that they engaged in with remedial reading or resource room teachers. A particular focus was whether collaborative planning was perceived differently by teachers whose students were served in pull-out programs, as compared to teachers whose students received "pull-in" reading instruction, whereby the specialist teacher taught in the general classroom. Structured interviews were conducted with 12 classroom teachers participating in the pull-in condition and 11 classroom teachers participating in the pull-out arrangement. Relative to the teachers involved in pull-out programs, the teachers engaged in the pull-in condition reported (1) more frequent collaborative meetings, (2) a greater focus on specific instructional issues rather than on student progress and adjustment, and (3) greater learning of specific instructional techniques. The implications of these findings for the successful implementation of teacher consultation models and for improving communication and coordination among specialist and classroom teachers are considered.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. American and German Elite Journalists' Attitudes toward Election Polls;International Journal of Public Opinion Research;2009-11-10

2. The Best of Both Worlds: Combining ECE and ECSE Philosophies and Best Practices Through a Coteaching Model;Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education;2006-09

3. COLLABORATIVE SCHOOL COMMUNITIES THAT SUPPORT TEACHING AND LEARNING;Reading & Writing Quarterly;2004-10

4. Problematizing Collaboration: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature on Teaching Teams;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2004-07

5. Do as We Say and as We Do;Journal of Teacher Education;2003-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3