Building Quantitative Cross-Cultural Databases From Ethnographic Records: Promise, Problems and Principles

Author:

Watts Joseph123,Jackson Joshua Conrad4,Arnison Chris2,Hamerslag Elise M.5,Shaver John H.12,Purzycki Benjamin Grant6

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research on Evolution, Belief, and Behaviour, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

2. Religion Programme, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

3. Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany

4. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

5. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

6. Department of the Study of Religion, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

Abstract

Quantitative cross-cultural databases can help uncover structure and diversity across human populations. These databases have been constructed using a variety of methodologies and have been instrumental for building and testing theories in the social sciences. The processes and assumptions behind the construction of cross-cultural databases are not always openly discussed by creators or fully appreciated by their users. Here, we scrutinize the processes used to generate quantitative cross-cultural databases, from the point of ethnographic fieldwork to the processing of quantitative cross-cultural data. We outline challenges that arise at each stage of this process and discuss the strengths and limitations of how existing databases have handled these challenges. We suggest a host of best practices for cross-cultural database construction, and stress the importance of coding source meta-data and using this meta-data to identify and adjust for source biases. This paper explicitly discusses the processes, problems, and principles behind cross-cultural database construction, and ultimately seeks to promote rigorous cross-cultural comparative research.

Funder

Marsden Fund, Royal Society Te Apārangi

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, an Understanding Unbelief Project

Templeton

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3