Affiliation:
1. Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA, USA
Abstract
Despite the sophisticated control of media in China, criticism of the party-state is not uncommon. Why does the authoritarian regime allow criticism? This article offers an explanation based on political institutions. It examines central-local government relations and finds that criticism can help advance the interests of different political actors. Criticism of local government bureaus and officials can help the central government ensure local compliance and create favorable public opinion. Local leaders can also use criticism to establish political authority over their subordinates and impress superiors, thus enhancing their chances to advance their career. Despite formal institutional arrangements, both central and local leaders have used informal measures such as criticism to achieve their political objectives. This underscores the importance of informal measures in the operation of China’s authoritarian regime.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference93 articles.
1. Bo Zhiyue (2002) Chinese Provincial Leaders: Economic Performance and Political Mobility since 1949. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
2. Development and Democracy
3. Burns John P. (1989) The Chinese Communist Party’s Nomenklatura System: A Documentary Study of Party Control of Leadership Selection, 1979–1984. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4. Strengthening Central CCP Control of Leadership Selection: The 1990 Nomenklatura
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献