A Comparison of the Quality of Work Experience in Government and Private Organizations

Author:

Cacioppe Ron1,Mock Philip1

Affiliation:

1. Western Australian Institute of Technology, School of Management

Abstract

A total of 5979 employees from a number of Australian government and private sector organizations participated in a survey measuring the quality of their work experience. This article examines the differences found between government and private sector employees' ratings of their work experience. The results of this study indicate that the government employees rate the quality of their work experience significantly below the level of their private sector counterparts. The most significant difference in the ratings was between high status government vs. high status private employees, with high status private employees rating their work experience well above the equivalent government group. An association was also found between the type of organization and employees' motivation for work. People working in public organizations were motivated more by factors such as providing a service or product that helps other people or self-development/self-fulfillment than private sector employees. Those in private organizations were motivated more by extrinsic factors such as money in order to obtain an enjoyable and pleasurable life. High status government employees were more intrinsically oriented than all other occupational groups. The lower rating of government employees' work experience may be related to the lack of fulfilling intrinsic factors in their work situations. The results of this study are similar to the results of previous studies which have compared work satisfaction in government vs. private organizations. The results suggest the need for well planned and coordinated organizational development programs in government departments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3