Promoting rigor and sustainment in implementation science capacity building programs: A multi-method study

Author:

Huebschmann Amy G.123ORCID,Johnston Shelly4,Davis Rachel5,Kwan Bethany M.167,Geng Elvin8,Haire-Joshu Debra49,Sandler Brittney8,McNeal Demetria M.127,Brownson Ross C.1011,Rabin Borsika A.11213

Affiliation:

1. Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU-Anschutz), Aurora, CO, USA

2. Division of General Internal Medicine, CU-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA

3. Ludeman Family Center for Women’s Health Research, CU-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA

4. Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

5. Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, UK

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, CU-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA

7. Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, CU-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA

8. Department of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases), Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

9. Department of Medicine (Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Sciences), Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

10. Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

11. Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

12. ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

13. Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Abstract

Background The field of Implementation science (IS) continues to evolve, and the number and type of IS capacity building Programs (ISCBPs) are in flux. These changes push the field to revisit the accepted IS competencies and to guide sustainment of ISCBPs. Our objectives were: (1) compare characteristics of current ISCBPs; (2) identify recommendations to support ISCBP sustainment; (3) measure how often ISCBPs address IS competencies; (4) identify novel and important IS competencies for the field. Method This multi-method study included ISCBPs delivering structured, longitudinal IS training, excluding single courses and brief workshops. We used three complementary methods to meet our objectives. First, we identified ISCBPs via an internet search and snowball sampling methods. Second, we surveyed these ISCBPs to identify areas of program focus, types of trainees, IS competencies addressed, and recommendations to sustain ISCBPs. Third, we conducted a modified Delphi process with IS researchers/leaders to reach consensus on the IS competencies that were both important and novel as compared to the IS competencies published to date. Results Among 74 eligible ISCBPs identified, 46 responded (62% response rate). Respondent ISCBPs represented diverse areas of focus (e.g., global health, cardiopulmonary disease) and trainee stages (e.g., graduate students, mid-career faculty). While most respondent ISCBPs addressed core IS methods, targeting IS competencies was less consistent (33% for nongraduate/non-fellowship ISCBPs; >90% for graduate/national ISCBPs). Our modified Delphi process identified eight novel and important IS competencies related to increasing health equity or the speed of translation. Recommendations to sustain ISCBPs included securing financial administrative support. Conclusions Current ISCBPs train learners across varying career stages in diverse focus areas. To promote rigor, we recommend ISCBPs address specific IS competencies, with consideration of these eight novel/emerging competencies. We also recommend ISCBPs report on their IS competencies, focus area(s), and trainee characteristics. ISCBP programs need administrative financial support. Plain Language Summary There is a limited workforce capacity to conduct implementation science (IS) research. To address this gap, the number and type of IS capacity building Programs (ISCBPs) focusing on training researchers and practitioners in IS methods continue to increase. Our efforts to comprehensively identify and describe ISCBPs for researchers and practitioners highlighted four implications for leaders of ISCBPs related to program sustainment and rigor. First, we identified a range of contextual characteristics of ISCBPs, including the research topics, methods, and IS competencies addressed, and the types of trainees accepted. Second, given the variability of trainee types and research, rigorous ISCBP programs should tailor the IS competencies and methods addressed to the skills needed by the types of trainees in their program. Third, the field of IS needs to periodically revisit the competencies needed with attention to the skills needed in the field. We used a consensus-building process with ISCBP leaders and other IS experts to expand existing IS competencies and identified eight important, novel IS competencies that broadly relate to promoting health equity and speeding the translation of research to practice. Finally, as more institutions consider developing ISCBPs, we identified factors needed to support ISCBP sustainment, including ongoing financial support. In addition to these implications for ISCBP leaders, there are also policy implications. For example, IS journals may enact policies to require manuscripts evaluating ISCBP performance to report on certain contextual characteristics, such as the IS competencies addressed and types of trainees accepted. The field may also consider developing an accreditation body to evaluate the rigor of ISCBP curricula.

Funder

UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center

Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute, Washington University ISC3

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Wellcome Trust

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute; Colorado Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control

University of Colorado Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science

Washington University Center for Dissemination and Implementation

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit

Washington University Institute for Public Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3