Theoretical models, assessment frameworks and test construction

Author:

Chalhoub-Deville Micheline1

Affiliation:

1. University of Minnesota

Abstract

The article reviews the usefulness of several models of proficiency that have influenced second language testing in the last two decades. The review indicates that several factors contribute to the lack of congruence between models and test construction, and makes a case for distinguishing between theoretical models, which attempt to represent the proficiency construct in various contexts and oper ational assessment frameworks, which depict the construct in particular contexts. Additionally, the article underscores the significance of an empirical, contex tualized and structured approach to the development of assessment frameworks.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics

Reference79 articles.

1. Alderson, J.C. 1991: Language testing in the 1990s: how far have we come? How much further have we to go? In Anivan, S. , editor, Current developments in language testing, Singapore: Regional Language Center, 1-26.

2. Comprehension and Text Genre: An Analysis of Secondary School Foreign Language Readers

3. Problems in Examining the Validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards a framework of critical thinking for assessing EAP speaking;Journal of English for Academic Purposes;2024-09

2. Chapter 12. Discussion, limitations, and future research;Understanding L2 Proficiency;2022-08-04

3. Critical Issues in the Training of Bilingual School Psychologists;Contemporary School Psychology;2020-11-30

4. Assessing writing ability in a foreign language at secondary school;Australian Review of Applied Linguistics;2018-10-12

5. Valid for the Elites? The Trade-Off Between Test Fairness and Test Validity;Second Language Learning and Teaching;2017-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3