Toward a systematic accessibility review process for English language proficiency tests for young learners

Author:

Christensen Laurene L.1ORCID,Shyyan Vitaliy V.2,MacMillan Fabiana3

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

2. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, USA

3. WIDA, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, USA

Abstract

In order to make assessments as widely accessible as possible, including to young learners from diverse backgrounds with a wide range of individual needs and characteristics, some developers of standardized tests have resorted to offering accessibility tools (e.g., magnifying/zoom) and accommodations (e.g., extended response time) to test takers. These solutions have some limitations stemming from the fact that they are retroactively applied to tests. One possible avenue to meet the accessibility needs of diverse students is to proactively address accessibility in the development of test content for all learners. In this article, we report on the development and piloting of a systematic accessibility review process intended for all test content at an organization producing large-scale standardized English proficiency tests for elementary and secondary education students in the United States. We describe the theoretical and research foundations related to fairness, accessibility, and universal design that guided our development of the accessibility review process followed by the process used to develop the tool. The application of the accessibility checklist to a kindergarten English language proficiency assessment is described in detail. Finally, we share some considerations for how the accessibility checklist could be used in other assessment development contexts.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics

Reference36 articles.

1. Agrawal J., Barrio B. L., Kressler B., Hsiao Y.J., Shankland R. K. (2019). International policies, identification, and services for students with learning disabilities: An exploration across 10 countries. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17(1), 95–114. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1218057.pdf

2. Cultural Competence: An Evolutionary Perspective

3. CAST. (2022). The UDL guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

4. Accessibility and Accommodations on Large-Scale Standardized Assessments

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3