Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP Online Risk Calculator Depends on How You Look at It: Results from the United States Gastric Cancer Collaborative

Author:

Beal Eliza W.1,Saunders Neil D.2,Kearney Joseph F.1,Lyon Ezra1,Wei Lai1,Squires Malcom H.2,Jin Linda X.3,Worhunsky David J.4,Votanopoulos Konstantinos I.5,Ejaz Aslam6,Poultsides George4,Fields Ryan C.3,Swords Douglas5,Acher Alexandra W.7,Weber Sharon M.7,Maithel Shishir K.2,Pawlik Timothy1,Schmidt Carl R.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio

2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

3. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

4. Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California

5. Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

6. Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland

7. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program online risk calculator for estimating risk after operation for gastric cancer using the United States Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Nine hundred and sixty-five patients who underwent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2000 and December 2012 at seven academic medical centers were included. Actual complication rates and outcomes for patients were compared. Most of the patients underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (404, 41.9%) and partial gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy (239, 24.8%) or Roux-en-Y reconstruction (284, 29.4%). The C-statistic was highest for venous throm-boembolism (0.690) and lowest for renal failure at (0.540). All C-statistics were less than 0.7. Brier scores ranged from 0.010 for venous thromboembolism to 0.238 for any complication. General estimates of risk for the cohort were variable in terms of accuracy. Improving the ability of surgeons to estimate preoperative risk for patients is critically important so that efforts at risk reduction can be personalized to each patient. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator is a rapid and easy-to-use tool and validation of the calculator is important as its use becomes more common.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3