Midterm Results of Retrograde In Situ Needle Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies

Author:

Luo Mingyao12,Fang Kun1,Fan Bowen1,Li Quanming3,Li Ming3ORCID,He Hao3,Li Xin3,Guo Yuanyuan2,Xue Yunfei1,Zhao Jiawei1,Wang Tun3,Yang Chenzi3,Li Jiehua3,Nienaber Christoph A.4,Shu Chang13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Xicheng District, Beijing, China

2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

3. Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

4. Cardiology and Aortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Imperial College London, UK

Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the in situ needle fenestration (ISNF) technique for reconstruction of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated aortic arch pathologies.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 of 50 patients (mean age 60.2±11.1; 45 men) who underwent ISNF to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR. Twenty-one of the patients also required revascularization of the left common carotid artery (LCCA; n=19) and innominate artery (IA; n=2) using physician-modified in vitro fenestration. Overall, 73 supra-aortic branches were targeted for revascularization.Results:ISNF was successful in 48 patients (96%); one LSA could not be stented and a tortuous LSA prevented the needle from fenestrating the graft. No perioperative major adverse event occurred. There were no type I and 4 type III endoleaks (8%), 3 of which occurred among the first 20 cases. Types II and IV endoleaks were found in 3 (6%) and 6 (12%) cases, respectively; all disappeared during a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3–66). One death (2%) occurred within 12 months due to cerebral hemorrhage. Two patients (4%) required open reinterventions at 6 and 62 months.Conclusion:ISNF for revascularization of the LSA during TEVAR seems to be feasible with acceptable midterm outcomes. The learning curve and evolving patient selection criteria affected technical success, complications, and the need for reinterventions. Long-term durability requires further evaluation.

Funder

Grant of CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine, China

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Beijing Science and Technology Project

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3