Australian Strike Activity in an International Context: 1964-85

Author:

Beggs John J.,Chapman Bruce J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Statistics, The Faculties and Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra, ACT 2601

Abstract

The relative level of strike activity delivered by the Australian industrial relations system is central to current debate. The most simple method of addressing this issue is to make international comparisons of average working days lost per employee from industrial disputation. This paper reports these data for fourteen OECD countries for 1964-85. Simple comparison of strikes is far from an ideal method for judging the relative efficacy of countries' industrial relations systems, for two main reasons. The first is that different criteria are used across countries for inclusion or collection of strike data. Australian statistics are relatively comprehensive, implying that some part of Australia's relatively high level of strike activity is attributable to measurement. Second, macroeconomic variables influence the incidence and duration of strikes. This simple observation renders suspect the use of international comparisons of these disputes data as reflections only of industrial relations systems, since differences in macroeconomic experience will manifest themselves, to some extent, in these data. Through control for inflation and unemployment, among other things, a more accurate assessment of the Australian industrial relations system in an international context is made possible. The Australian system apparently delivers lower, or about the same, strike activity as culturally and politically similar countries. Overall there is no reason to believe that Australia is markedly different from the international norm.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial relations,Business and International Management

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Industrial Relations Reform: Chasing a Pot of Gold at the End of the Rainbow?;Australian Economic Review;2012-08-28

2. A LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES IN AUSTRALIA: 1913-2003;Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy;2005-09

3. Sympathy for the Devil?: Australian Unionism and Public Opinion;Australian Journal of Political Science;2002-03

4. “THATCHERISM” VERSUS “CORPORATISM”: AUSTRALIAN, UK COMPARISONS;Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy;1999-03

5. Did Arbitration Make for Dependent Unionism? Evidence from Historical Case Studies;Journal of Industrial Relations;1996-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3