Did Arbitration Make for Dependent Unionism? Evidence from Historical Case Studies

Author:

Gahan Peter

Abstract

The analysis of Australian union behaviour, growth and structure has centred on the relationship between unions and arbitration. To varying degrees it has been assumed that Australian unions are dependent on arbitration for the supply of resources critical to their functions. The nature and extent of this dependency have, however, remained empirically unexplored. Yet it is clear that if this depend ency relationship were a valid description of the relationship between unions and arbitration, its implications for the survial of unions under a different labour law regime would be profound. This paper, through the investigation of four historical case studies. questions the validity of the dependency hypothesis as a useful explanation of Australian union behaviour. A number of concerns emerge from the case analysis. To begin with, the general interpretation of key historical moments that the dependency hypothesis relies on does not capture the diversity of experience evident in these four cases. While arbitration played an important role in influencing union behav iour by altering the costs and incentives of pursuing particular strategies, the evidence suggests that a range of other factors account for this diversity. Moreo ver, arbitration was not only an institutional structure that unions faced. Rather, part of their strategic interplay with it was concerned with shaping the system to further their own goals through the use of different 'bundles' of political and industrial resources at the disposal of individual unions. Most importantly, to the extent that these unions were dependent organizations, they were dependent on a range of institutional and organizational mechanisms for the supply of critical resources. Arguably, this study also has profound implications for how more generalized accounts of union development are constructed and theorized. A localized analysis, which focuses on individual unions and their own micro- contexts, is advanced as a more appropriate starting point for union theory.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial relations,Business and International Management

Reference152 articles.

1. Arthur, W.B. (1988) 'Self Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics', in Anderson, P. W., Arrow, K. J. and Pines, D. (eds) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Addison Wesley , Redwood, California, pp. 9-31.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. THE RISE AND RISE OF ENTERPRISE BARGAINING IN AUSTRALIA, 1991–2011;Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work;2012-05

2. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND TRANS-TASMAN CURRENTS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATION;Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work;2011-04

3. THE MAKING OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS POLICY: WHERE ARE WE NOW AND HOW DID WE GET HERE?;Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work;2010-08

4. THE ORGANISING MODEL IN AUSTRALIA: A REASSESSMENT;Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work;2009-12

5. WHY BECOME A SHOP STEWARD? EVIDENCE FROM AUSTRALIAN UNIONS;Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work;2009-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3