Better than Nothing? Is Non-union Partnership a Contradiction in Terms?

Author:

Johnstone Stewart1,Ackers Peter2,Wilkinson Adrian3

Affiliation:

1. Loughborough University, UK,

2. Loughborough University, UK

3. Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

Though the notion of union-management partnership commands an extensive body of literature, little is known about non-union partnership arrangements. This article addresses the relatively unexplored issue of non-union partnership through a detailed case study of WebBank, a British Internet bank. Three main themes are explored. First, we seek to understand more about the meaning of — and rationale for — partnership in non-union settings. Second, we explore the operation of non-union partnership in practice. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of non-union partnership from the perspectives of various organizational actors. The article suggests that in judging the effectiveness of a partnership arrangement, or indeed any voice regime more generally, there is a need to re-consider the benchmarks for success, and to place them in the context of contemporary employment relations. The evidence suggests that it would be deeply unhelpful and inaccurate to dismiss a non-union partnership a priori as a ‘contradiction in terms’.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial relations,Business and International Management

Reference65 articles.

1. Reframing employment relations: the case for neo‐pluralism

2. Ackers, P., Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A. and Dundon, T. ( 2005) ‘Partnership and Voice With or Without Trade Unions: Changing UK Management Approaches to Organisational Participation’ , in M. Stuart and M. Martinez-Lucio (eds) Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, pp. 23-45. London: Routledge.

3. Partnership agreement adoption and survival in the British private and public sectors

4. Labour-management partnership in the non-union retail sector

5. The Conditions Promoting Compromise in the Workplace

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3