Affiliation:
1. University of Missouri–St. Louis
2. The University of Kansas
Abstract
More students with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) are attending post-secondary education than ever before. As more students with IDD enter college, inclusive post-secondary education programs (IPSE) will be required to make important decisions about the types of services and supports they provide. IPSE program staff should aim to provide supports and services that honor students’ dignity of risk and facilitate opportunities for students to take risks. The purpose of this article is to describe a conceptual framework IPSE program staff can use to assess the extent to which the supports and services they provide enable risk-taking opportunities for students in their program. The framework includes five steps: identify areas for growth, understand risks and rewards for students and stakeholders, evaluate natural supports and determine appropriate supplemental supports, identify and enable access to natural consequences, and reflect and plan for more authentic risk. An example of how to use the framework in the context of residential housing will be described.
Reference25 articles.
1. Benito N. (2012). Perspectives on life after high school for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Findings of a statewide survey of families. Think College. https://thinkcollege.net/sites/default/files/files/resources/Insight_13_F.pdf
2. Bumble J. L., Worth C., Athamanah L. S., Rooney-Kron M., Regester A., Lidgus J. (2021). “Messy Inclusion”: A call for dignity of risk in inclusive postsecondary education. Inclusive Practices. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745211050023
3. Francis G. L., Fuchs E., Johnson A. D., Gordon S., Grant A. (2016). Developing parent-professional partnerships in a postsecondary education program for students with disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 53(10), 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21974
4. Francis G. L., Stride A., Reed S. (2018). Transition strategies and recommendations: Perspectives of parents of young adults with disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 45(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12232
5. Griffin M. M., McMillan E. D., Hodapp R. M. (2010). Family perspectives on post-secondary education for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(3), 339–346. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880108
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献