Affiliation:
1. North-West University
2. Central University of Technology
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore how the brain processes information, and which factors affect the information processing ability of learners in the classroom. From the hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) analysis, it is evident that the independent variables age, home language, language of learning and teaching (LOLT), and average class size affect the information processing ability of learners in the classroom. The process by which the brain acquires, use, and think about knowledge is known as cognition. Cognition are those intellectual or perceptual processes occurring within us that the typical individual would describe as thinking, rational processing, or the mind. Through learning, an individual’s cognition develops long-term changes in mental representations or associations because of environmental learning and experiences. A quantitative design was followed to gather data from Grade 11 learners by means of a questionnaire. The results revealed that information processing ability of learners as a dependent variable was significantly influenced by the following independent variables: age, home language, language of learning and teaching, and average class size. Recommendations to teachers on how to facilitate efficient information processing are made, which could result in meaningful learning and understanding by the learners. It is hoped by the researchers that, employing these tactics, will render valid results that are consistent with the need to enhance learners’ depth and breadth of processing information, and thereby become sophisticated and complex producers of knowledge.
Publisher
International e-Journal of Educational Studies
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference57 articles.
1. Anderson, J. R. (2007). Information processing modules and their relative modality specificity. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 185–217.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence, & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2) (pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
3. Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.
4. Blake, C. (2016). Metacognition in the classroom. Concordia University-Portland. Retrieved from: https://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/classroom-metacognition/
5. Bridewell, W., & Bello, P. (2016). A theory of attention for cognitive systems. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 4(1), 1–16.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献