Cultural Influence on Brand Personality Preferences: Individualists Prefer Sophisticated and Competent Brands while Collectivists Prefer Sincere Brands
Author:
Axhami Mirdaim1, Axhami Loreta2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Marketing and Tourism, Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana, Rr. Arben Broci, Tirana, ALBANIA 2. Department of Journalism and Communication, Faculty of History and Philology, University of Tirana, Rr. Elbasanit, Tirana 1001, ALBANIA
Abstract
In this research, we examine the extent to which culture influences brand personality preference, based on specific personality dimensions. This research focuses on two main group-level cultures: individualists and collectivists. We introduce and examine the variations in preferences of Sincere, Competent, and Sophisticated brand personalities and how cultural orientations influence brand personality preference. Based on previous literature, we suggest that consumers in collectivistic countries show a higher preference for brands with Sincere personalities. Moreover, we suggest that consumers in individualistic countries show a higher preference for brands with competent and sophisticated personalities. We also suggest that the mechanism underlying these effects is the perceived symbolic meaning of the brand. This effect is moderated by the cultural background (collectivistic vs. individualistic) of the consumer. This research contributes to the literature on brand personality traits, brand symbolic meaning, and cultural orientations. We discuss implications for marketers for global marketing strategies.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference56 articles.
1. Aaker, J. L., Dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 347- 356. 2. Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V., Garolera, J., Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 3, 2001, 492. 3. Aaker, J., Fournier, S., Brasel, S. A., When good brands do bad, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1, 2004, 1-16. 4. Azoulay, A., & Kapferer, J. N., Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality?, The Journal of Brand Management, 11, 2, 2003, 143-155. 5. Phau, I., & Lau, K. C., Conceptualising brand personality: A review and research propositions, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 9, 1, 2000, 52-69.
|
|