Affiliation:
1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Beijing, China..
Abstract
High-resolution image and waveform inversion of small-scale targets requires the handling of high-frequency seismic wavefields. However, conventional finite-difference (FD) methods have strong numerical dispersions in the presence of high-frequency components. To reduce these numerical dispersions, we optimized the constant coefficients of the FD operator by maximizing the wavenumber coverage within a given error limitation. We set up three general criteria to enhance the convergence of the algorithm and reduce the optimization effort. We selected the error limitation to be 0.0001, this being the smallest in the literature, which led to perfect agreement between theoretical analyses and numerical experiments. The accuracy of our optimized FD methods can even reach that of much higher order unoptimized FD methods, which means great savings of computational efforts and memory demand. These advantages become even more apparent with 3D modeling, especially for saving memory demand.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference17 articles.
1. Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows
2. Etgen, J. T., 2007, A tutorial on optimizing time domain finite-difference schemes: “Beyond Holberg”: SEP, Report 129, 33–43.
3. Etgen, J. T., and S. Brandsberg-Dahl, 2009, The pseudo-analytical method: application of pseudo-Laplacians to acoustic and acoustic anisotropic wave propagation: 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2552–2556.
4. Computational methods for large-scale 3D acoustic finite-difference modeling: A tutorial
5. Classroom Note:Calculation of Weights in Finite Difference Formulas
Cited by
145 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献