Fast modeling of gamma-gamma density measurementsvia gamma-ray point-kernel approximations

Author:

Luycx Mathilde1ORCID,Torres-Verdín Carlos1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.(corresponding author).

Abstract

Forward-modeling algorithms based on flux sensitivity functions are commonly recognized as fast, reliable, and the most efficient way to implement inversion-based interpretation algorithms for borehole nuclear measurements. Second-order sensitivity functions enhance the accuracy of fast-forward-modeling algorithms in complex geometries: In the presence of standoff, density accuracy is improved up to 70% compared with first-order approximations. However, second-order sensitivity functions can only be generated with the Monte Carlo [Formula: see text]-Particle code for perturbations in bulk density, material composition, and reaction cross sections; therefore, their use is limited to gamma-gamma borehole density measurements. We have developed an alternative method to second-order approximations in complex 3D geometries. It is the first step toward future improvements to simulate borehole environmental effects across arbitrary well trajectories for nuclear measurements based on coupled neutron and gamma-ray transport. The gamma flux-difference (GFD) method quantifies gamma-ray flux perturbations using exponential point kernels and Rytov approximations. Gamma-ray point kernels are corrected for flux buildup and flux perturbations caused by radial heterogeneities, i.e., standoff. Correction coefficients are calculated by flux-fitting 1D radial sensitivity functions yielded by MCNP to the 1D exponential gamma-ray kernel; they depend on standoff and mud density, but they are negligibly affected by formation properties. The GFD method is benchmarked against Monte Carlo calculations. Compared with first-order approximations, it improves simulated density accuracy across regions of significant contrasting properties, up to [Formula: see text] with 3.18 cm (1.25 in) standoff and freshwater mud. The GFD method yields a maximum density error of [Formula: see text] across complex geometries and up to up to 4.45 cm (1.75 in) standoff, similar to that achieved by second-order forward modeling algorithms. Moreover, the principles behind GFD approximations can be adapted to measurements based on coupled neutron and gamma-ray transport.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3