Sensitivity analysis of data-related factors controlling AVA simultaneous inversion of partially stacked seismic amplitude data: Application to deepwater hydrocarbon reservoirs in the central Gulf of Mexico

Abstract

We consider the inversion of synthetic and recorded seismic amplitude variation with angle AVA data to appraise the influence of several data-related factors that control the vertical resolution and accuracy of the estimated spatial distributions of elastic properties. We use measurements acquired in deepwater hydrocarbon reservoirs in the central Gulf of Mexico to generate synthetic seismic amplitude data and evaluate inversion results with both synthetic and recorded seismic amplitudes. Detailed sensitivity analysis of synthetic amplitude data indicates that, even in the most ideal scenario (perfectly migrated data, isotropic media, noise-free seismic amplitude data, sufficient far-angle coverage, and accurate estimates of angle-dependent wavelets and low-frequency components), input elastic models are not reconstructedaccurately by the inversion of synthetic seismic amplitudes. We attribute this result to the relatively low vertical resolution of the seismic amplitude data. P-wave impedance is the most accurate of the inverted properties, followed by S-impedance and bulk density. Additionally, sufficient far-angle coverage is crucial for the accurate estimation of 1D distributions of S-impedance and bulk density. We show that time alignment of partial-angle stacks for correcting residual NMO effects improves the vertical resolution of the estimated spatial distributions of elastic parameters and consistently decreases the data misfit. Finally, we found that the accuracy of the inverted distributions of elastic parameters is improved substantially by (1) increasing the preserved AVA information via multiple single-angle stacks, (2) correcting the P-wave velocity field used for calculating angles in partial-angle stacking, and (3) excluding far-angle data with low signal-to-noise ratios.