Lithofacies identification from well-logging curves via integrating prior knowledge into deep learning

Author:

Jiang Chunbi1ORCID,Zhang Dongxiao2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Southern Institute of Industrial Technology, Shenzhen, China.

2. Eastern Institute of Technology, Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Ningbo, China; Department of Mathematics and Theories, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China; and Southern University of Science and Technology, National Center for Applied Mathematics Shenzhen (NCAMS), Shenzhen, China. (corresponding author)

Abstract

Lithofacies is a key parameter in reservoir characterization. With advances in machine learning, many researchers have attempted to predict lithofacies from well-log curves by using a machine-learning algorithm. However, existing models are built purely on data, which do not provide interpretability. In addition, lithofacies distribution is highly imbalanced. We incorporate domain knowledge into a gated recurrent unit network to force the model to learn from the data and knowledge. The domain knowledge that we use is expressed as first-order logic rules and is incorporated into the machine-learning pipeline through additional loss terms. Specifically, these rules are: (1) if the density is smaller than or equal to [Formula: see text], then the lithofacies is coal; (2) if the density is larger than or equal to [Formula: see text] or the neutron porosity is smaller than or equal to [Formula: see text], then the lithofacies is anhydrite; and (3) if the gamma-ray value is larger than or equal to [Formula: see text], then the lithofacies is shale. Here, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] are the parameters that are learned by the model. By applying this domain knowledge, we aim to elucidate why the model predicts lithofacies as coal, anhydrite, or shale and reduce the effect of imbalanced data on the model’s performance. We evaluate the method on a data set from the North Sea, and the machine-learning pipeline with domain knowledge embedded is slightly superior compared with the baseline model that does not consider domain knowledge. One drawback of the method is that the domain knowledge that we provide only works for coal, anhydrite, and shale, which is incomplete. In future work, we will attempt to develop more rules that work for other types of lithofacies.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3