Affiliation:
1. University of Calgary, Department of Geology & Geophysics, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. Emails:
Abstract
This paper proposes a multicomponent acquisition and preprocessing polarity standard that will apply generally to the three Cartesian geophone components and the hydrophone or microphone components of a 2‐D or 3‐D multicomponent survey on land, at the sea bottom, acquired as a vertical seismic profile, vertical‐cable, or marine streamer survey. We use a four‐component ocean‐bottom data set for purposes of illustration and example. A primary objective is a consistent system of polarity specifications to facilitate consistent horizon correlation among multicomponent data sets and enable determination of correct reflectivity polarity.The basis of this standard is the current SEG polarity standard, first enunciated as a field‐recording standard for vertical geophone data and hydrophone streamer data. It is founded on a right‐handed coordinate system: z positive downward; x positive in the forward line direction in a 2‐D survey, or a specified direction in a 3‐D survey, usually that of the receiver‐cable lines; and y positive in the direction 90° clockwise from x. The polarities of these axes determine the polarity of ground motion in any component direction (e.g., downward ground motion recording as positive values on the vertical‐geophone trace). According also to this SEG standard, a pressure decrease is to be recorded as positive output on the hydrophone trace. We also recommend a cyclic indexing convention, [W, X, Y, Z] or [0, 1, 2, 3], to denote hydrophone or microphone (pressure), inline (radial) geophone, crossline (transverse) geophone, and vertical geophone, respectively.We distinguish among three kinds of polarity standard: acquisition, preprocessing, and final‐display standards. The acquisition standard (summarized in the preceding paragraph) relates instrument output solely to sense of ground motion (geophones) and of pressure change (hydrophones). Polarity considerations beyond this [involving, e.g., source type, wave type (P or S), direction of arrival, anisotropy, tap‐test adjustments, etc.] fall under preprocessing polarity standards. We largely defer any consideration of a display standard.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference16 articles.
1. Barr, F. J., and Sanders, J. I., 1989, Attenuation of water‐column multiples using pressure and velocity detectors in a water‐bottom cable: 59th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 653–656.
2. Rise times of attenuated seismic pulses detected in both empty and fluid‐filled cylindrical boreholes
3. Brook, R. A., Landrum, R. A., and Sallas, J. J., 1993, Report to the SEG Technical Standards Committee regarding proposed polarity convention for vibratory source/recording systems: Soc. Expl. Geophys., http://www.seg.org/publications/tech‐stand/index_body.html.
4. Fulton, T. K., Ashworth, M. A., Larner, K. L., Lindsey, J. P., and Queffelec, T. A., 1981, Special report of the subcommittee on display polarity standards: Soc. Expl. Geophys.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. New Trends: HS, MAAM and Beyond;Efficient Joint Analysis of Surface Waves and Introduction to Vibration Analysis: Beyond the Clichés;2020
2. Constraints on Gas Hydrate Distribution and Morphology in Vestnesa Ridge, Western Svalbard Margin, Using Multicomponent Ocean‐Bottom Seismic Data;Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth;2019-05
3. Index;Seismic Wave Theory;2019-03-28
4. Answers to Selected Exercises;Seismic Wave Theory;2019-03-28
5. Plane Waves in Anelastic Media;Seismic Wave Theory;2019-03-28