Cultural Frames of Ethics, a Challenge for Information and Knowledge Organization

Author:

El Hadi Widad Mustafa

Abstract

Purpose/Thesis: Culture is the common frame that can embrace the other facets like social and political aspects of classification that are at play when we talk about ethical dimensions. This article explores the cultural frames of ethics by identifying fundamental characteristic of biases of KOSs, namely classifications and indexing languages as variants of KOSs. These biases are examined through the lenses of ethics. The main focus is on structural biases generated by mainstream classification and indexing schemes. Conceptual issues, some examples of cultural and racial biases and some directions for future work are discussed.Approach/Methods: Based on a literature review of methods used in detecting biases, two inde­xing languages are chosen: subject authority file RAMEAU and LCSH. To show how knowledge organization systems contribute to marginalization, exclusion and stigmatization of a category of the population, and/or of a culture with reference to the French context a comparison between RAMEAU and LCSH was conducted.Results and conclusions: In order to deal effectively with the ethical issues they face, library professio­nals and institutions providing knowledge must have a good working knowledge of information ethics.Originality/Value: The author defines the cultural frame of ethics and demonstrates that a bias is hard to shift. The research conducted by the author and her students to verify the range of biases in RAMEAU showed that the efforts made to fight biases in KOSs brought positive results when it comes to LCSH, but it showed that the other systems based on this indexing language have main­tained their initial biases. The author calls for solid and sustainable actions to fight against KOSs inherited persistent biases.

Publisher

Polish Librarians' Association

Reference66 articles.

1. Adler, M. A., Tennis, J. T. (2013). Toward a Taxonomy of Harm in Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 266–272.

2. Barát, Á. H. (2008). Knowledge Organization in the Cross-cultural and Multicultural Society. In C. Arsenault, J. T. Tennis (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Organization: Vol. 11, Culture and Identity in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference, Montréal, Canada (91–97). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.

3. Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2013). Introduction to Information Science. London: Facet Publishing.

4. Beghtol, C. (2002). Universal Concepts, Cultural Warrant and Cultural Hospitality. In M. López-Hu¬ertas (ed.). Advances in Knowledge Organization: Vol. 8. Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, 10–13 July 2002, Granada, Spain (45–49). Würz¬burg: Ergon-Verlag.

5. Beghtol, C. (2005). Ethical Decision-Making for Knowledge Representation and Organization Sys¬tems for Global Use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 903–912.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3