Transparency and the future of semantic searching in academic libraries

Author:

Eller Daniel W.1

Affiliation:

1. , , Oral Roberts University, , , USA

Abstract

“Semantic search” is a fairly broad term without a fixed goal amongst developers. Most agree that semantic searching should reach beyond simple keyword or text/string matching in order to provide more robust taxonomies and relevant information retrieval systems. Many novice users and first-year students struggle to retrieve the scholarly sources they desire because they lack the specialized vocabulary attained through advanced years of study. Most students are used to the dominant semantic search discovery system, Google and Google Scholar, but few students understand how these systems work. Query parsing, fuzzy matching, and understanding how semantic searching utilizes taxonomies for more accurate tagging is not usually a consideration for a desperate sophomore looking for last-minute sources to finish a paper that is due the next day. So, there is a danger that meeting a student’s perceived need for a Google-like discovery system is more important than creating a transparent system. However, information literacy and library instruction must give careful consideration to these issues and be able to help emerging scholars/students understand both the ethical and practical horizons of semantic search tools.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference24 articles.

1. A multi-layer framework for semantic modeling;Silva;Journal of Documentation,2020

2. Towards a diversified knowledge organization system: An open network of inter-linked subsystems with multiple validity scopes;Zhitomirsky-Geffet;Journal of Documentation,2019

3. I. Galili, Promotion of cultural content knowledge through the use of the history and philosophy of science, Science and Education 15(1) (2006), CCK Galili.pdf (isidore.co), accessed September 23, 2022.

4. Interactive search on the web: The story so far;Aghaei;Information,2022

5. Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness;Ananny;Science, Technology, & Human Values,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Databases, Search Engines;Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3