Affiliation:
1. Téluq–UQAM,Montréal,
2. Département de relations industrielles,UQO,Outaouais,
Abstract
As the global economy undergoes a major transformation, the inadequacy of labour relations theories dating back to Fordism, especially the systemic analysis model (Dunlop, 1958) and the strategic model (Kochan, Katz and McKersie, 1986), in which only three actors—union, employer and State—share the stage is becoming increasingly obvious. A good example is provided by companies offering information technology services to businesses, where new means of regulation emerge and illustrate the need to incorporate new actors and new issues if we are to account for its contemporary complexity. A survey of 88 professionals has revealed regulation practices that call into question the traditional boundaries of the industrial relations system from two points of view: that of the three main actors, by bringing the customer and work teams onto the stage, and that of the distinction between the contexts and the system itself.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference53 articles.
1. Abbott, Brian. 2006. “Determining the Significance of the Citizens’ Advice Bureau as an Industrial Relations Actor.” Employee Relations, 28 (5), 435–448.
2. Alvesson, Mats. 1995. Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
3. Alvesson, Mats. 2000. “Social Identity and the Problem of Loyalty in Knowledge-Intensive Companies.” Journal of Management Studies, 37 (8), 1101–1123.
4. Anderson-Gough, Fiona, Christopher Grey and Keith Robson. 2000. “In the Name of the Client: The Service Ethic in Two Professional Services Firms.” Human Relations, 53 (9), 1151–1174.
5. Arthur, Michael B. and Denise M. Rousseau. 1996. The Boundaryless Career. A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献