Author:
Arnavas Francesca,Bellini Mattia
Abstract
<p>“Fairy tales begin with conflict because we all begin our lives with conflict,” famously states Jack Zipes. And yet, this statement does not always seem to apply to non-Western story structures, such as the Asian kishōtenketsu, which implies a story development that does not necessarily revolve around conflicts. In many of Hayao Miyazaki’s movies (e.g., My Neighbor Totoro; Spirited Away, The Secret World of Arietty), it is possible to detect, on the one hand, the kishōtenketsu-based plot, and,on the other hand, the widespread presence of Western fairy-tale tropes. Conflicts in traditional Western fairy tales may sometimes manifest in the form of riddles to solve. Although Miyazaki’s stories do not shun away from riddles, how do these riddles relate to conflicts? How are Western and Asian story structures bound together in Miyazaki’s narratives, and what effects does this hybridization generate in their audiences? This article argues that: 1.) Riddles based on Western fairy tales in Miyazaki’s work do not necessarily involve conflicts, and are recast and re-elaborated in highly unusual ways; and 2.) The employment of these unusual patterns, mixing up together Oriental and Occidental frames of reference, gives rise to stories that puzzle the mind of spectators, working as complex narrative riddles.</p>
Reference38 articles.
1. Bellini, Mattia. ‘Formal Organization and Complex Responses to Video Games Narratives’. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, no. CHI PLAY, Oct. 2021, p. 275:1-275:17. September 2021, https://doi.org/10.1145/3474702.
2. Bendazzi, Giannalberto. Animation: A World History. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
3. Bird, Paul. “A Review of Dramatic Structure in Natsume Soseki’s Botchan and Thomas Hughes’s Tom Brown’s School Days”. 長崎県立大学,vol. 7, 2022, pp. 1-7. http://54.64.218.135/dspace/handle/10561/1882
4. Butler, Catherine. “Arrietty Comes Home: Studio Ghibli’s The Borrower Arrietty and Its English-Language Dubs”. Annals of The Institute for Comparative Studies of Culture 80, pp. 57-71.
5. Cahill, David. “The Myth of the “Turn” in Contrastive Rhetoric”. Written Communication, vol. 20, no. 2, 2003, pp. 170-194. DOI: 10.1177/0741088303255353