From Planning to Spatial Foresight in Québec: What Future-Telling Means in a Context of Sub-regional Governance. The Case of Vision 2031

Author:

Le Berre Sylvain

Abstract

Since the adoption of the sustainable development policy in 2006, a strategic vision is now required for planning proceedings in Quebec, especially for Regional County Municipalities (RCMs) in charge of a supra-municipal Schéma d’aménagement et de développement (SAD). Focusing on the renewal proceedings of the SAD of Rivière-du-Loup’s RCM between 2009 and 2013, this research analyzes the process of shaping such a strategic vision, and the place of this vision in the management of a sub-regional governance. During that four-year period, this RCM led a sub-regional coalition of both public and private actors in a cross-cutting and joined-up process called Vision 2031. This process involved more than experts and decision-makers; it opened its future-oriented process to the wider civil society. This was significant for three reasons. First, it expressed a shift from the retrospective to more forward-looking knowledge building. Second, it translated a switch from sectoral planning to cross-cutting planning. Third, it represented an on-going process towards more collaborative ways of proceeding. Territorialization and horizontalization of spatial planning policies constitute a same process; it implies that responsibility for development stems not only from decision-makers but from the entire sub-regional community. In other words, in a context of challenging public institutions’ political capacity and crisis of top-down model of management, such new spatial foresight proceedings highlight the emergence of a new type of sub-regional public regulation – a governance by the future.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Reference65 articles.

1. Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K.R., (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of American Planning Association, 69(2), 113–129.

2. Andersson, J. (2012). The great future debate and the struggle for the world. American Historical Review, 117(5), 1411-1430.

3. Böhme, K. (2002). Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning : Discursive Integration in Practice., Stockholm: Nordregio.

4. Cadiou, S. (2007). Jeux et enjeux de connaissances. L'expertise au service de la gouvernance municipale. In R. Pasquier, V. Simoulin, & J., Weisbein, (Eds.), La gouvernance territoriale. Pratiques, discours et théories (pp. 171–189). Paris: LGDJ.

5. Cordobès, S. (2013). Prospective territoriale. In J. Lévy & MJ. Lussault, (Eds.), Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés (pp. 819–821). Paris : Belin.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3