State Regulation and the New Taylorism

Author:

Lund John1,Wright Christopher2

Affiliation:

1. School for Workers and the Industrial Relations Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

2. School of Industrial Relations and Organisational Behaviour, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Studies of the diffusion of new workplace technologies and management practice often fail to account for differences in state labour regulation. This article examines the role of the state in seeking to regulate the introduction of an American system of computerized work monitoring in the Australian grocery warehouse industry. While the establishment of a government inquiry into the technology offered the potential for significant constraints upon management control, over time the state’s role shifted to a more accommodating stance that endorsed management’s right to use the new technology. The reasons underlying the state’s ultimate support for the technology are explored, as are the broader implications for national variations in the global diffusion of new workplace technologies.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference50 articles.

1. Bartholomeusz, S. 2001. “Cherry Pickers Hover Over Floundering Franklins.” The Age, 27 February.

2. Beeby, M. 1999. “Davids’ Goliath Turnaround.” Australian Financial Review, 23 November,28.

3. Boyle, J. 2000. “Woolworths’ Profits Lift to $295.5 Million.” Australian Financial Review, 29 August,1.

4. Bramble, T. 1989. “Award Restructuring and the Australian Union Movement: A Critique.” Labour and Industry, Vol. 2, No. 3, 372–398.

5. Buchanan, J. and R. Callus. 1993. “Efficiency and Equity at Work: The Need for Labour Market Regulation in Australia.” Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, No. 4, 515–537.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3