Neo-Taylorism in the Digital Age: Workplace Transformations in French and German Retail Warehouses

Author:

Gautié Jérôme1,Jaehrling Karen2,Perez Coralie3

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Paris, France

2. Senior Researcher, Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation, Fakultät für Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany

3. Senior Researcher, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Centre d’Économie de la Sorbonne, UMR 8174 (CNRS – Université de Paris 1), Paris, France

Abstract

The paper analyzes how digitalization in conjunction with changes to the economic environment are affecting the nature of low-skilled jobs in the logistics sector; in particular, job content and the working and employment conditions attached to those jobs. On the basis of expert interviews and company case studies in French and German retail warehouses, the authors investigate whether the adaptation of these jobs corresponds to the more general ‘neo-Taylorist’ transformation of workplaces discussed in the literature and seek to identify those factors that are helping to stabilize or modify this trend. Drawing on the comparative labour relations literature, which distinguishes between different types of workers’ power resources (institutional, associational and structural), the study examines how and to what extent employees and their representatives renegotiate or influence techno-organizational choices. By focusing on firms headquartered in France and Germany, we can shed some light on whether the institutional power of organized labour may enable them to foster trajectories other than the kind of ‘digital Taylorism’ we see in liberal market economies. The findings point, however, to a general convergence on digitally enhanced ‘Neo-Taylorism,’ which is characterized by deskilling and intensification of performance control. The limited cross-country variation can largely be explained by the very similar effects across countries of ‘lean’ supply-chain transformation and the trend toward outsourcing and offshoring, which negatively affect workers’ structural power. Moreover, associational resources are negatively affected by the deskilling trend. Meanwhile, the findings provide some evidence of a beneficial impact from the institutional power of worker representatives in both countries: in particular, the rights to veto and co-determine performance management systems. These rights have not altogether helped prevent the shift toward neo-Taylorism but have contributed to somewhat less intense forms of neo-Taylorism.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference33 articles.

1. Alimahomed-Wilson, Jake and Immanual Ness, eds. (2018) Choke Points. Logistics Workers Disrupting the Global Supply Chain. London: Pluto Press.

2. Amossé, Thomas and Thomas Coutrot (2011) “Socio-Productive Models in France: An Empirical Dynamic Overview 1992-2004.” ILR Review, 64 (4), 786-817.

3. Arntz, Melanie, Terry Gregory and Ulrich Zierahn (2016) “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries. A Comparative Analysis.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, Paris: OECD Publishing.

4. Bain, Peter and Phil Taylor (2000) “Entrapped by the ‘Electronic Panopticon’? Worker Resistance in the Call Centre.” New Technology, Work and Employment, 15 (1), 2-18.

5. Benvegnù, Carlotta, Bettina Haidinger and Devi Sacchetto (2018) “Restructuring Labour Relations and Employment in the European Logistics Sector: Unions’ Responses to a Segmented Workforce.” In Virginia Doellgast, Nathan Lillie and Valeria Pulignano, eds. (2018) Reconstructing solidarity. Labour Unions, Precarious Work and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 83-103.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New technology and workers’ perceived impact on job quality: Does labor organization matter?;Economic and Industrial Democracy;2024-09-02

2. Good girls? Ideal workers in online retail warehousing;Gender, Work & Organization;2024-06-27

3. Stochastic Machine Witnesses at Work: Today's Critiques of Taylorism are Inadequate for Workplace Surveillance Epistemologies of the Future;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

4. The Evolution of Perspectives on the role of Digitalisation in the Development of Labour Relations and Human Resources Policy;Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal;2024-04-12

5. Que sait‐on du travail ?;Que sait‐on du travail ?;2023-10-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3