Valuation Constellations

Author:

Waibel Désirée,Peetz Thorsten,Meier Frank

Abstract

The focus on situated practices in current valuation studies becomes an obstacle when situations are too narrowly defined, when moments of valuation are treated as isolated events and especially when the interconnectedness of moments across situations and social fields is neglected. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose the concept of valuation constellations (Meier et al. 2016). Based on the literature on valuation the concept distinguishes positions and their relations, rules, and infrastructures. We present these three components of constellations and demonstrate the potential of the concept regarding three analytical puzzles of valuation analysis: historical change of valuation processes, the definition and solution of valuation problems, and the legitimacy of valuations. Each of the puzzles is illustrated with an empirical case, i.e. dating platforms and apps, higher education, and amateur reviewing. Going beyond situationalism, the valuation constellations perspective is key to understanding interconnected valuation processes.

Publisher

Linkoping University Electronic Press

Reference122 articles.

1. Abbott, Andrew. 1995. “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research 62(4): 857–882.

2. Anagnostopoulos, Dorothea, Stacey Rutledge, and Valentina Bali. 2013. “State Education Agencies, Information Systems, and the Expansion of State Power in the Era of Test-Based Accountability.” Educational Policy 27(2): 217–247.

3. Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. “Machine Bias: There’s Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it’s Biased against Blacks.” ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing, accessed 17 June 2017.

4. Aspers, Patrik. 2008. “Analyzing Order: Social Structure and Value in the Economic Sphere.” International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie 18(2): 301–316.

5. Bergmann, Jörg R. 1993. Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: De Gruyter.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3