Mach Number and Heating Effects on Turbulent Supersonic Jets

Author:

Georgiadis Nicholas J.1,Wernet Mark P.1,Locke Randy J.2,Eck Dennis. G.1

Affiliation:

1. NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135

2. HX5 LLC, Cleveland, Ohio 44135

Abstract

Modern experimental techniques were used to obtain detailed aerodynamic and thermodynamic data for turbulent supersonic jets. Operating points from the work of Seiner et al. for heated Mach 2 jets were used as a starting point for the matrix of cases examined here using a geometrically similar Mach 2 nozzle. Two additional nozzles were examined having design Mach numbers of 1.36 and 1.63. For each Mach number, multiple jet temperatures were investigated. Jet measurements were first made with stagnation pressure and temperature probes for comparison to the previous experiments. The experiments focused on modern nonintrusive measurement techniques, including particle image velocimetry for mean and root-mean-square (rms) velocities, and rotationally resolved Raman scattering spectroscopy for mean and rms temperatures. Experimental results showed that as jet Mach number increases, the overall jet mixing rate decreases, as indicated by the potential core length, downstream mean velocities, and turbulence levels. Similar behavior was observed in the mean temperatures and rms temperatures. The suppression of turbulence as the jet Mach number increases is due to compressibility. For a fixed jet Mach number, increasing the jet temperature resulted in faster mixing by all measures. Peak turbulent stress levels, located along the lipline of the jet, demonstrated trends in individual stress components that differed depending on whether jet Mach number or temperature was varied, but indicated that the turbulence structure parameter [Formula: see text] was very similar when varying either jet temperature or Mach number.

Funder

Glenn Research Center

Publisher

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Reference62 articles.

1. SlotnickJ.KhodadoustA.AlonsoJ.DarmofalD.GroppW.LurieE.MavripilisD. “CFD Vision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences,” NASA CR 2014-218178, March 2014.

2. Assessment Criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validation Experiments

3. Navier–Stokes analysis methods for turbulent jet flows with application to aircraft exhaust nozzles

4. Status of turbulence modeling for hypersonic propulsion flowpaths

5. EggersJ. M. “Velocity Profiles and Eddy Viscosity Distributions Downstream of Mach 2.22 Nozzle Exhausting to Quiescent Air,” NASA TN-D 3601, Sept. 1966.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3