1. Imm OJB: 6 29 MOLE % ti 20 IN AIR M IHZI. FUEL MASS FLUX, gH2/cm 2-9
2. The M(H2) versus X(&) data plots n Figs. 6-9 are well represented by exponential regression fits in all four cases (TableZ ) , similar to that found previously for 0th-r contaminants.6'1' The correlation coefficients in Table 2 support the apparent good quality of the fits. In all cases, increasing H2 concentration in the fuel is related to an exponential increase in M(&) at Blowoff and Restore, particularly for X(&) > 0.8. Fig. 7. OJB results for 6.29mole percent water kn
3. c A B r* 0.00 0.00155 4.48579 0.992 6.29 0.001518 4.29544 0.989 10.40 0.00162 4.14913 0.Y94 16.63 0,001916 3.80318 0.996 RESTORE: