1. 2,2 1987,0.035596 COI?Cll*C21 0.85667,0.93048,0.14391
2. 2,2
3. 888-2.053loglot,t>0.75 b 1.10 t1.4
4. Figure21 indicatesthat the number of injectionports in the GH2 had the most significant effect faceplate heating, while the GOX splitratio phad nodiscernible effect, as for the Isp,eesults. Statistical analysis indicated the following trends toward lower heating rates: fewer GHZ ports, lower swirl GOX injector pressure drop, higher auxiliary GOX injector pressure drop, lower GH2 injector pressure drop, and longer chamberlength.