Abstract
The call to radicalise social work is not new. Some of us are “mature” enough toremember Bailey and Brake’s 1975 treatise on the subject. Radical concepts slip and slide around the social work agenda in a semisustainable way. But its enduring presence is masked by terms that fit less controversially into the conservative world order: critical, structural, and transformative among them.In this comment piece, I argue that we do not need to merely revitalise the radical but to name it, proudly and loudly.
Publisher
University of Otago Library
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献