Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: An individual patient data meta-analysis'

Author:

Watson James A123ORCID,Commons Robert J34ORCID,Tarning Joel25ORCID,Simpson Julie A6ORCID,Llanos Cuentas Alejandro7ORCID,Lacerda Marcus VG8ORCID,Green Justin A9,Koh Gavin CKW10ORCID,Chu Cindy S211ORCID,Nosten François H211ORCID,Price Richard N234ORCID,Day Nicholas PJ25ORCID,White Nicholas J25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases

2. Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford

3. WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network

4. Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University

5. Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University

6. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne

7. Unit of Leishmaniasis and Malaria, Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Alexander von Humboldt”, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

8. Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado

9. GSK

10. Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital

11. Shoklo Malaria Research Unit

Abstract

In our recent paper on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine (Watson et al., 2022), we used all available individual patient pharmacometric data from the tafenoquine pre-registration clinical efficacy trials to characterise the determinants of anti-relapse efficacy in tropical vivax malaria. We concluded that the currently recommended dose of tafenoquine (300 mg in adults, average dose of 5 mg/kg) is insufficient for cure in all adults, and a 50% increase to 450 mg (7.5 mg/kg) would halve the risk of vivax recurrence by four months. We recommended that clinical trials of higher doses should be carried out to assess their safety and tolerability. Sharma and colleagues at the pharmaceutical company GSK defend the currently recommended adult dose of 300 mg as the optimum balance between radical curative efficacy and haemolytic toxicity (Sharma et al., 2024). We contend that the relative haemolytic risks of the 300 mg and 450 mg doses have not been sufficiently well characterised to justify this opinion. In contrast, we provided evidence that the currently recommended 300 mg dose results in sub-maximal efficacy, and that prospective clinical trials of higher doses are warranted to assess their risks and benefits.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3