Limits for Coregonus migratorius (Georgi, 1775) catches and likely ecological effects
-
Published:2020-10-19
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:132-143
-
ISSN:2413-0958
-
Container-title:South of Russia: ecology, development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Ûg Ross.: èkol. razvit.
Author:
Anoshko P. N.1ORCID, Makarov M. M.1ORCID, Zorkaltsev V. I.1ORCID, Denikina N. N.1ORCID, Dzyuba E. V.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Limnological Institute, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Aim. This study aims to discuss the validity of introducing restrictions on the catch of Coregonus migratorius (Georgi, 1775) with a forecast of the likely environmental consequences of doing so.Discussion. We show the results of the analysis of the assessment of the state of C. migratorius stocks and the reasons for their decline. We indicate that the biostatistical and hydroacoustical methods for estimating fish numbers, which are traditionally used to substantiate allowable catches, have some disadvantages and limitations. We consider unrecorded catches and unfavourable natural and climatic environmental factors to be reasons for the decline in C. migratorius stocks. We discuss ecological and anthropogenic factors of changes in stocks of this commercially important species for the region. We show the anticipated ecological effects of currently established limits.Conclusion. The results of changes in the modelling of the number and age composition of fish with different protection strategies indicate that maintaining a low level of replenishment stock the limits would not increase commercial stocks of C. migratorius. Restrictions imposed on the commercial and amateur fishing would significantly increase environmental risks through increase of poaching (including during the spawning period) as well as as a consequence of amateur fishing of other commercially valuable fish species.
Publisher
Institute of Applied Ecology
Subject
Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference37 articles.
1. Anneville O., Lasne E., Guillard J., Eckmann R., Stockwell J.D., Gillet C., Yule D.L. Impact of fishing and stocking practices on Coregonid diversity. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2015, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1045-1055. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2015.611108 2. DeVanna Fussell K.M., Smith R.E.H., Fraker M.E., Boegman L., Frank K.T., Miller T.J., Tyson J.T., Arend K.K., Boisclair D., Guildford S.J., Hecky R.E., Hӧӧk T.O., Jensen O.P., Llopiz J.K., May C.J., Najjar R.G., Rudstam L.G., Taggart C.T., Rao Y.R., Ludsin S.A. A perspective on needed research, modeling, and management approaches that can enhance Great Lakes fisheries management under changing ecosystem conditions. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2016, vol. 42, iss. 4, pp. 743-752. DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.04.007 3. Zhang F., Reid K.B., Nudds T.D. Effects of walleye predation on variation in the stock-recruitment relationship of Lake Erie yellow perch. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2018, vol. 44, iss. 4, pp. 805-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.05.007 4. Marchal P., Andersen J.L., Aranda M., Fitzpatrick M., Goti L., Guyader O., Haraldsson G., Hatcher A., Hegland T.J., Le Floc'h P., Macher C., Malvarosa L., Maravelias C.D., Mardle S., Murillas A., Nielsen J.R., Sabatella R., Smith A.D.M., Stokes K., Thoegersen T., Ulrich C. A comparative review of fisheries management experiences in the European Union and in other countries worldwide: Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand. Fish and Fisheries, 2016, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 803-824. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12147 5. Jayasinghe R.P.P.K., Amarasinghe U.S., Newton A. Evaluation of status of commercial fish stocks in European marine subareas using mean trophic levels of fish landings and spawning stock biomass. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2017, vol. 143, pp. 154-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.07.002
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|