Author:
Esfahani Navid Nasr,Stinson Douglas R.
Abstract
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>All-or-nothing transforms (AONTs) were originally defined by Rivest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14">14</xref>] as bijections from <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ s $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> input blocks to <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ s $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> output blocks such that no information can be obtained about any input block in the absence of any output block. Numerous generalizations and extensions of all-or-nothing transforms have been discussed in recent years, many of which are motivated by diverse applications in cryptography, information security, secure distributed storage, etc. In particular, <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-AONTs, in which no information can be obtained about any <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> input blocks in the absence of any <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> output blocks, have received considerable study.</p><p style='text-indent:20px;'>In this paper, we study three generalizations of AONTs that are motivated by applications due to Pham et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13">13</xref>] and Oliveira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12">12</xref>]. We term these generalizations rectangular, range, and restricted AONTs. Briefly, in a rectangular AONT, the number of outputs is greater than the number of inputs. A range AONT satisfies the <inline-formula><tex-math id="M6">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-AONT property for a range of consecutive values of <inline-formula><tex-math id="M7">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. Finally, in a restricted AONT, the unknown outputs are assumed to occur within a specified set of "secure" output blocks. We study existence and non-existence and provide examples and constructions for these generalizations. We also demonstrate interesting connections with combinatorial structures such as orthogonal arrays, split orthogonal arrays, MDS codes and difference matrices.</p>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Computer Networks and Communications,Algebra and Number Theory,Applied Mathematics,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics,Computer Networks and Communications,Algebra and Number Theory
Reference18 articles.
1. C. J. Colbourn and J. H. Dinitz, eds, The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Second Edition, CRC Press, 1996.
2. P. D'Arco, N. Nasr Esfahani and D. R. Stinson, All or nothing at all, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 23 (2016), paper 4.10, 24 pp.
3. D. A. Drake.Partial λ-geometries and generalized Hadamard matrices over groups, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 31 (1979), 617-727.
4. N. N. Esfahani, Generalizations of All-or-nothing Transforms and Their Application in Secure Distributed Storage, PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, 2021.
5. N. N. Esfahani, I. Goldberg, D. R. Stinson.Some results on the existence of t-all-or-nothing transforms over arbitrary alphabets, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64 (2018), 3136-3143.