Author:
Sissoko Penda, ,Synnevag Gry,Aune Jens B.,
Abstract
<abstract>
<p>This study assessed the effects of introducing a technology package consisting of seed priming and microdosing of mineral fertilizer on sorghum and pearl millet yield, cereal production, net value of cereal production, household expenditure, adoption rate of technology and household food security in the millet and sorghum producing areas in Mopti, Segou and Koulikoro regions of Mali. Three different surveys were undertaken to collect the data during the period from 2013 to 2015. The first survey assessed the farmers practices (360 households), the second survey assessed production, household expenditure and food security in the households (54 households) and the third survey assessed the adoption rates of the technologies (108 households). The surplus cereal production was in average 1155 kg/household for adopting households while non-adopting households had a surplus of only 196 kg/household. The monetary surplus increased from 31.2 Euro for non-adopting households to 215.6 Euro for adopting households. Households using the package spent 167.8 Euro on health, children's education, and other necessities while non-adopting households spent only 29.5 Euro. Furthermore, households using the package spent 55.9 Euro on fertilizer against close to zero for non-adopting households. Finally, the number of food insecure months were significantly reduced from 3.57 months for the adopting households to 1.24 months for non-adopting households. The technology package initiated positive development pathways characterized by increased production and income, surplus grain production, investments in livelihood assets and yield-enhancing technologies and improved food security. This link from technology introduction to improved food security is very important from a development perspective, but there is a lack of research that clearly demonstrate this effect in the drylands of West Africa. Future interventions to ensure a more broad-based development should focus on continued investment in yield-enhancing technologies, diversification of production to ensure better access to high quality food, strengthening the role of women, and building institutions to support farmers' livelihood and agency.</p>
</abstract>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference32 articles.
1. GSF (2014) Global Strategic Framework for Food Security & Nutrition (GSF). Third Version. Committee on World Food Security (CFS). Available from: www.unscn.org/files/cfs/GSF_Version_3_EN.pdf.
2. HLPE (2020) Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition and the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. Available from: www. fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf.
3. Giller KE (2020) The food security conundrum of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Food Sec 26: 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100431
4. Hampshire K, Casiday R, Kilpatrick K, et al. (2009) The social context of childcare practices and child malnutrition in Niger's recent food crises. Disasters 33: 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01066.x
5. Dufour C, Kauffmann D, Marsland N (2014) Enhancing the links between resilience and nutrition. In: Fan S, Pandya-Lorch R, Yosef S (Eds.), Resilience for Food and Nutrition Security. IFPRI, Washington, 107–117.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献