Affiliation:
1. University of Calgary, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Health, Calgary, Canada
2. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Center, Lethbridge, Canada
3. Practicing veterinarian, Veterinary Agri-Health Services, Airdrie, Canada
4. Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Lameness is an important health issue in feedlot cattle; however, there is a paucity of information regarding its economic impact. Decision tree models are excellent tools for assessing costs of disease such as the net return (net return = benefit – cost). Models were developed using expert opinion, literature and retrospective feedlot data provided by Vet-Agri Health Services (VAHS, Airdrie, Alberta, Canada) collected from 2005 to 2015 on individually treated cattle (n = 30,940) from 28 feedlots. The objective was to estimate net return of various lameness diagnoses and impacts of cattle type, season of treatment, and extreme high and low cattle prices. Cattle were diagnosed as lame according to the following categories: foot rot, foot rot in heavy cattle (BW > 363 kg at treatment), injury, lame with no visible swelling, and joint infection. Records consisted of arrival and treatment weight, cost of treatment, and cattle deaths. Records included cattle types classified as: fall calves (heifer and steer), winter calves (heifer and steer) and yearling cattle (heifer and steer). Lastly, variables ADG, days on feed (DOF), and Season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) were created. Models estimated net return using cattle slaughter prices for healthy cattle that reached a slaughter weight of 635 kg and for three possible outcomes for each diagnosis after final treatment: cattle that recovered after treatment and reached a slaughter weight of 635 kg; cattle that were removed before they reached slaughter weight; or cattle that died. Compared to undiagnosed cattle with 1.36 kg/d ADG, cattle diagnosed with foot rot and foot rot heavy cattle had the highest ADG until first treatment (1.14 and 1.57 kg/d, respectively) and differed significantly (P < 0.05) compared to cattle diagnosed with injuries (0.87 kg/d), lame with no visible swelling (0.64 kg/d), and joint infections (0.53 kg/d). Yearling steers had the most positive returns compared to all other cattle types. Cattle with lighter arrival weight had lower ADG and increased economic losses after treatment compared to heavier weighted cattle on arrival. Based on average slaughter prices over a 10-yr period for healthy cattle, return was $690. Return after final treatment for cattle with foot rot was $568, foot rot in heavy cattle was $695, and injury was $259. However, joint infections and lame with no visible swelling had negative returns of –$286 and –$701, respectively.
Funder
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Lethbridge Research Center
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference25 articles.
1. Influence of body condition score on by-product yield and value from cull beef cows;Apple;J. Anim. Sci.,1999
2. An evaluation of the metaphylactic effect of Ceftiofur crystalline free acid in feedlot calves*;Booker;Vet. Ther.,2006
3. CanFax
2013. Agri Benchmark: Feedlot analysis. http://www.canfax.ca/Samples/Feedlot%20COP%20Analysis.pdf. (Accessed June 2 2016.)
4. Evaluation of economic and performance outcomes associated with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in commercial feeder cattle;Cernicchiaro;Am. J. Vet. Res.,2013
5. A retrospective survey of diseases of feedlot cattle in Alberta;Church;Can. Vet. J.,1981