Author:
Wong Nicholas S. T.,Malmuthge Nilusha,Gellatly Désirée,Nordi Wiolene M.,Alexander Trevor W.,Ortega Polo Rodrigo,Janzen Eugene,Schwartzkopf-Genswein Karen,Jelinski Murray
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lameness is defined as altered or abnormal gait due to dysfunction of the locomotor system, and is a health issue of feedlot cattle, having major economic, labour, and welfare implications. Digital dermatitis (DD—a lesion of the plantar surface of the foot) and foot rot (FR—affects the interdigital cleft) are common infectious causes of lameness in feedlots. These hoof lesions can occur alone or in combination (DD + FR) in the same hoof. A total of 208 hoof swabs were collected from three commercial feedlots located in southern Alberta. Every lesion sample was matched with a corresponding control skin sample taken from a healthy contralateral foot. Control skin samples were also collected from cattle with no lesion on any feet. Bacterial communities of three types of hoof lesions (DD, DD + FR, FR) and healthy skin were profiled using 16S amplicon sequencing.
Results
Alpha diversity analysis revealed a lower bacterial diversity on DD and FR lesions compared to control skin. Beta diversity analysis showed that bacterial communities of DD, FR, and DD + FR lesions were distinct from those of the control skin. While the impact of feedlot was minimal, lesion type contributed to 22% of the variation observed among bacterial communities (PERMANOVA-R = 0.22, P < 0.01). Compared to the corresponding control skin, there were 11, 12, and 3 differentially abundant (DA) bacterial genera in DD, DD + FR, and FR lesions, respectively.
Conclusions
The bacterial community description of a DD + FR lesion is a novel finding. Not only did lesions lead to altered bacterial communities when compared to healthy skin, but the composition of those communities also differed depending on the hoof lesion. The 16S amplicon sequencing of surface swabs has significant value as a research tool in separating different hoof lesions and can provide additional insights to the polybacterial etiology of DD and FR in feedlot cattle.
Funder
Beef Cattle Research Council Beef Cluster fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Davis-Unger J, Pajor EA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Marti S, Dorin C, Spackman E, et al. Economic impacts of lameness in feedlot cattle1. Translational Animal Science. 2017;1:467–79.
2. Whay HR, Shearer JK. The impact of lameness on welfare of the dairy cow. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2017;33:153–64.
3. Desrochers A, Anderson DE, St-Jean G. Lameness examination in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2001;17(39–51):v–vi.
4. Marti S, Jelinski MD, Janzen ED, Jelinski MJ, Dorin CL, Orsel K, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of risk factors associated with cattle lameness in southern Alberta feedlots. cjas. 2021;101:647–54.
5. Sweeney M, Watts J, Portis E, Lucas M, Nutsch R, Meeuwse D, et al. Identification of Porphyromonas levii isolated from clinical cases of bovine interdigital necrobacillosis by 16S rRNA sequencing. Vet Ther. 2009;10:E1-10.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献