Can Double Auctions Control Monopoly and Monopsony Power in Emissions Trading Markets?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Can Double Auctions Control Monopoly and Monopsony Power in Emissions Trading Markets?

Published:2002-07 Issue:1 Volume:44 Page:70-92
ISSN:0095-0696
Container-title:Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Author:

Andrew Muller R.,Mestelman Stuart,Spraggon John,Godby Rob

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics

Reference24 articles.

1. Effects of restrictions on international permit trading: The MS-MRT model;Bernstein,1999

2. Determinants of the benefits of international carbon emissions trading: Theory and experimental evidence;Bohm,1998

3. J. Brown-Kruse, S. R. Elliott, and, R. Godby, Strategic Manipulation of Pollution Permit Markets: An Experimental Approach, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 95-10, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1995.

4. The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems;Crocker,1966

5. Pollution, Property and Prices;Dales,1968

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Combinatorial Auction Based on Social Choice in the Internet of Things;2023 14th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT);2023-12-26

2. Data Sharing Enabled Through Internet of Things (IoT) in Wireless Communication Networks;2023 6th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I);2023-09-14

3. Depreciating Licenses;American Economic Journal: Economic Policy;2022-08-01

4. The performance of multi-type environmental credit trading markets: Lab experiment evidence;Journal of Environmental Economics and Management;2022-01

5. Zero‐intelligence versus human agents: An experimental analysis of the efficiency of Double Auctions and Over‐the‐Counter markets of varying sizes;Journal of Public Economic Theory;2021-03-08