Affiliation:
1. Autonomous University of Mexico (Mexico)
Abstract
This article reflects about the weight women have had in the field of Political Science in and about Latin America during the last decade. This text not only describes and analyzes the existing gender gap in compared research about Latin America, but also it focuses the attention in how the discipline as a profession is exercised. The main objective of this paper is to generate initial reflections about of the status of women in the discipline in Latin America as well as how we do research, what we teach and what we publish (and with whom) in the discipline. The women are underrepresented in Political Science meetings, syllabi, and editorial boards. This is done under the premise that Political Science is a gendered discipline that reproduces exclusionary views, beliefs, and practices and also operates under a certain level of “gender blindness”
Reference61 articles.
1. Acker, J. (1992, September). Gendered Institutions: From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology, (21), 565-569.
2. Alvarez, S. (1980). Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. American Political Science Association (2004). Women’s Advancement in Political Science: A Report of the APSA Workshop on the Advancement of Women in Academic Political Science in the United States. Available at http://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED495970.pdf.
4. Atchison, A. (2018). Towards the Good Profession: Improving the Status of Women in Politi-cal Science. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1-2), 279-298.
5. Barrientos del Monte, F. (2012). La institucionalización de la Ciencia Política en América Lati-na. In: F. Reveles Vázquez (coord.), La Ciencia Política en México hoy: ¡qué sabemos? México: Plaza y Valdés, 21-48.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献