Gender Blindness in Latin American Political Science

Author:

Freidenberg Flavia D.1

Affiliation:

1. Autonomous University of Mexico (Mexico)

Abstract

This article reflects about the weight women have had in the field of Political Science in and about Latin America during the last decade. This text not only describes and analyzes the existing gender gap in compared research about Latin America, but also it focuses the attention in how the discipline as a profession is exercised. The main objective of this paper is to generate initial reflections about of the status of women in the discipline in Latin America as well as how we do research, what we teach and what we publish (and with whom) in the discipline. The women are underrepresented in Political Science meetings, syllabi, and editorial boards. This is done under the premise that Political Science is a gendered discipline that reproduces exclusionary views, beliefs, and practices and also operates under a certain level of “gender blindness”

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference61 articles.

1. Acker, J. (1992, September). Gendered Institutions: From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology, (21), 565-569.

2. Alvarez, S. (1980). Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

3. American Political Science Association (2004). Women’s Advancement in Political Science: A Report of the APSA Workshop on the Advancement of Women in Academic Political Science in the United States. Available at http://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED495970.pdf.

4. Atchison, A. (2018). Towards the Good Profession: Improving the Status of Women in Politi-cal Science. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1-2), 279-298.

5. Barrientos del Monte, F. (2012). La institucionalización de la Ciencia Política en América Lati-na. In: F. Reveles Vázquez (coord.), La Ciencia Política en México hoy: ¡qué sabemos? México: Plaza y Valdés, 21-48.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3