Performance of the SEDLine Monitor: Age Dependency and Time Delay

Author:

Obert David P.1,Schneider Frederick1,Schneider Gerhard1,von Dincklage Falk2,Sepulveda Pablo3,García Paul S.4,Kratzer Stephan1,Kreuzer Matthias1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Technical University of Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany

2. Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Base San José, Osorno/Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Devices monitoring the hypnotic component of general anesthesia can help to guide anesthetic management. The main purposes of these devices are the titration of anesthesia dose. While anesthesia at low doses can result in awareness with intraoperative memory formation, excessive administration of anesthetics may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurocognitive disorder. We have previously shown for various indices that they are significantly influenced by the patient’s age and that the monitors have a significant time delay. Here, we evaluated the influence of patient’s age and time delay on the patient state index (PSI) of the SEDLine monitor. METHODS: To analyze the influence of the patient’s age, we replayed 2 minutes of electroencephalography (EEG) of 141 patients (19–88 years, ASA I–IV) undergoing general anesthesia maintained with desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol to the SEDLine monitor. We extracted the PSI as well as the spectral edge frequency (SEF) and performed a linear regression analysis. For evaluation of the time delay, we replayed 5 minutes of EEG of stable episodes of adequate anesthesia (PSI between 25 and 50) or light sedation/wake (PSI >70) in different orders to the SEDLine to simulate sudden changes between the states. Time delays were defined as the required time span of the monitor to reach the stable target index. RESULTS: PSI and SEF increased significantly with the patient’s age. These findings did not depend on the administered anesthetic. The evaluation of the correlation between SEF and PSI showed a strong correlation with Spearman’s correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.86 (0.82; 0.89). The time delays depended on the type of transition. We found a median time delay of 54 (Min: 46; Max: 61) seconds for the important transition between adequate anesthesia and awake and 55 (Min: 50; Max: 67) seconds in the other direction. CONCLUSIONS: With our analyses, we show that the indices presented on the SEDLine display, the PSI and the SEF, increase with age for patients under general anesthesia. Additionally, a delay of the PSI to react to sudden neurophysiologic changes due to dose of the maintenance anesthetic is of a time course that is clinically significant. These factors should be considered when navigating anesthesia relying on only the proprietary index for the SEDLine monitor.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium.;Aldecoa;Eur J Anaesthesiol,2017

2. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on the Role of Neuromonitoring in Perioperative Outcomes: Electroencephalography.;Chan;Anesth Analg,2020

3. Effect of Electroencephalography-Guided Anesthetic Administration on Postoperative Delirium Among Older Adults Undergoing Major Surgery: the ENGAGES Randomized Clinical Trial.;Wildes;JAMA,2019

4. Processed electroencephalogram and evoked potential techniques for amelioration of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction following non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures in adults.;Punjasawadwong;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

5. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma.;Brown;N Engl J Med,2010

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3