Abstract
We provide a novel approach to understanding the multiple causations of maternal anaemia in a geospatial context, highlighting how genetics, environment and socioeconomic disparities at the micro-geographical level lead to the inequitable distribution of anaemia. All first-trimester pregnant women registered for the antenatal care programme in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka from July to September 2019 were invited to the Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort (RaPCo), which assessed the prevalence of anaemia in early pregnancy. The combination of the prevalence of anaemia and minor haemoglobinopathy-related anaemia (MHA) with the poverty headcount index of the 22 health divisions in the district was investigated using GeoDa spatial K-means clustering. Sociodemographic and economic data at the divisional level were compared between identified clusters. Combining the analysis with the geographical and environmental characteristics of the region, further hypotheses regarding anaemia in this community were formulated. The study included data from 3,137 pregnant women in early pregnancy. The anaemia and MHA prevalence varied from 13.6 to 21.7% and from 2.6% to 5%, respectively. We identified four distinct spatial clusters. The cluster with the highest anaemia prevalence also included high poverty and the highest prevalence of MHA. The clusters had significant differences with regard to ethnic distribution, access to water, sanitation and dietary patterns. Areas supplied by major irrigation projects had significantly low levels of anaemia, probably attributable to internal migration and improved livelihood. It was evident that genetic, socioeconomic and environmental risk factors were grouped at the divisional level, and that their complex interactions make controlling anaemia with blanket interventions unsuccessful. Analysis of the distribution of heterogeneous risk factors at the micro-geospatial level helped identify context-specific approaches to tackle anaemia in pregnancy.
Subject
Health Policy,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Adesogan AT, Havelaar AH, McKune SL, Eilittä M, Dahl GE, 2020. Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters. Glob Food Sec 25,100325.
2. African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank Department for International Development, & United Kingdom Directorate-General for Development, 2004. Poverty and Climate Change Reducing the Vulnerability of the Poor through Adaptation. https://lib.icimod.org/record/11215/files/1307.pdf?type=primary
3. Agampodi TC, Wickramasinghe ND, Prasanna RIR, Irangani MKL, Banda JMS, 2020. The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort (RaPCo): study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20,374.
4. Agegenehu CD, Tesema GA, Teshale AB, Alem AZ, Yeshaw Y, Kebede SA, Liyew AM, 2021. Spatial distribution and determinants of iron supplementation among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a spatial and multilevel analysis. Arch Public Health 79:143.
5. Ahmed F, Khan MR, Shaheen N, Ahmed KMU, Hasan A, Chowdhury IA, Chowdhury R, 2018. Anaemia and iron deficiency in rural Bangladeshi pregnant women living in areas of high and low iron in groundwater. Nutr 51–52:46–52.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献