Social Outcomes and Acceptability of Two Peer-Mediated Interventions for High School Students With Severe Disabilities: A Pilot Study

Author:

Asmus Jennifer M.1,Carter Erik W.2,Moss Colleen K.3,Born Tiffany L.4,Vincent Lori B.5,Lloyd Blair P.6,Chung Yun-Ching7

Affiliation:

1. Jennifer M. Asmus, Department of Educational Psychology and The Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison;

2. Erik W. Carter, Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee;

3. Colleen K. Moss, The Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison;

4. Tiffany L. Born, Department of Educational Psychology and The Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison;

5. Lori B. Vincent, Department of Educational Psychology and The Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison;

6. Blair K. Lloyd, Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; and

7. Yun-Ching Chung, Department of Special Education, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.

Abstract

Abstract Adolescents with severe disabilities often have few opportunities to learn alongside and connect socially with peers without disabilities at their high school. In this pilot study, nine high school students with severe disabilities were randomly assigned to three conditions: peer support arrangements, peer network intervention, or a comparison condition involving “business-as-usual” paraprofessional support. School staff served as intervention facilitators and researchers coached and monitored fidelity. Increased classroom interactions were observed for students in the peer support condition and enhanced social contacts and friendships were found for students in both peer support and peer network conditions. Students, peers, and educators perceived both peer-mediated interventions as highly acceptable and feasible. Drawing upon these exploratory findings, we offer recommendations for research and practice focused on fostering strong social connections within high schools.

Publisher

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3