Affiliation:
1. Ruth Luckasson, University of New Mexico
2. Marc J. Tassé, The Ohio State University
3. Robert L. Schalock, Hastings College
Abstract
Abstract
This article addresses the need to clearly understand professional responsibility and the critical role it plays in the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), in shaping professions for the better, and in enhancing the functioning of society for the benefit of all. Understanding professional responsibility is especially timely during the current transformation that is occurring in the field of IDD. To that end, the article discusses what is a profession, who is a professional, and what is professional responsibility. Using a logic model framework, the article describes the components of professional responsibility that include its building blocks such as respect for the person, professional ethics and standards, critical thinking skills, and clinical judgment; its use of nine professional practices including empowerment, evidence-based practices, individualized supports, and person-centered outcome evaluation; its outcomes in terms of mutual trust, the improved effectiveness of clinical functions, and professional accountability; and its impacts regarding individual benefit, professional integrity, and societal enhancement.
Publisher
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Community and Home Care,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference52 articles.
1. AAIDD/The Arc.
(2017).
Addressing the causes and effects of intellectual and developmental disabilities [Joint position statement of AAIDD and The Arc].
https://www.aaidd.org/news-policy/policy/position-statements/addressing-the-causes-and-effects-of-intellectual-and-developmental-disabilities
2. American Psychological Association.
(2017).
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.
Author.https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
3. The Arc.
(2020).
Framework for the future of the Arc.
https://thearc.org/about-us/our-strategic-framework/
4. Azzam,
T.,
&
Levine,B.
(2015).
Politics in evaluation: Politically responsive evaluation in high stakes environments.
Evaluation and Program Planning, 58,
48–
56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.002
5. Bradley,
V. J.,
&
Moseley,C.
(2007).
National core indicators: Ten years of collaborative performance measurement.
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 354–
358.
https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2007)45[354:NCITYO]2.0.CO;2
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献