Professional Responsibility in the Field of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Its Definition, Application, and Impacts

Author:

Luckasson Ruth1,Tassé Marc J.2,Schalock Robert L.3

Affiliation:

1. Ruth Luckasson, University of New Mexico

2. Marc J. Tassé, The Ohio State University

3. Robert L. Schalock, Hastings College

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses the need to clearly understand professional responsibility and the critical role it plays in the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), in shaping professions for the better, and in enhancing the functioning of society for the benefit of all. Understanding professional responsibility is especially timely during the current transformation that is occurring in the field of IDD. To that end, the article discusses what is a profession, who is a professional, and what is professional responsibility. Using a logic model framework, the article describes the components of professional responsibility that include its building blocks such as respect for the person, professional ethics and standards, critical thinking skills, and clinical judgment; its use of nine professional practices including empowerment, evidence-based practices, individualized supports, and person-centered outcome evaluation; its outcomes in terms of mutual trust, the improved effectiveness of clinical functions, and professional accountability; and its impacts regarding individual benefit, professional integrity, and societal enhancement.

Publisher

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Community and Home Care,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference52 articles.

1. AAIDD/The Arc. (2017). Addressing the causes and effects of intellectual and developmental disabilities [Joint position statement of AAIDD and The Arc]. https://www.aaidd.org/news-policy/policy/position-statements/addressing-the-causes-and-effects-of-intellectual-and-developmental-disabilities

2. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Author.https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf

3. The Arc. (2020). Framework for the future of the Arc. https://thearc.org/about-us/our-strategic-framework/

4. Azzam, T., & Levine,B. (2015). Politics in evaluation: Politically responsive evaluation in high stakes environments. Evaluation and Program Planning, 58, 48– 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.002

5. Bradley, V. J., & Moseley,C. (2007). National core indicators: Ten years of collaborative performance measurement. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 354– 358. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2007)45[354:NCITYO]2.0.CO;2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3