Affiliation:
1. Robert L. Schalock, Hastings College (Nebraska)
2. Ruth Luckasson, University of New Mexico
3. Marc J. Tassé, The Ohio State University
4. K. A. Shogren, University of Kansas
Abstract
Abstract
Changes in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) over the last 5 decades has resulted in the emergence of the shared citizenship paradigm. This paradigm is currently guiding the development of IDD-related policies and practices, and providing a framework for application, research-based inquiry, and evaluation. A shared citizenship paradigm is one that envisions, supports, and requires the engagement and full participation of people with IDD as equal, respected, valued, participatory, and contributing members of every aspect of society. The overall goals of the paradigm are to (a) further advance and focus on people with IDD as active agents in the change process, and (b) improve outcomes for people with IDD, including their access to and opportunity for shared citizenship. This article describes the paradigm's operationalization, application, evaluation, shaping for the future, and specific strategies to overcome implementation challenges.
Publisher
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Community and Home Care,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference56 articles.
1. Bogart,
K. R.,
&
Dunn,D. S.
(2019).
Ableism: Special issue introduction.
Journal of Social Issues, 75,
650–
664.
https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12354
2. Brendtro,
L. K.,
Brokenleg,
M.,
&
Van Brockern,S.
(2002).
Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for the future.
Education Service.
3. Brown,
I.,
Wehmeyer,
M. L.,
&
Shogren,K. A.
(2017).
What is meant by the terms intellectual disability and developmental disabilities.
InWehmeyerM. L.,BrownI.,PercyM.,ShogrenK. A., &
FunkW. L. A.(Eds.),A comprehensive guide to intellectual disability and developmental disabilities(pp.3–
18).
Paul Brookes.
4. Claes,
C.,
Vandenbussche,
H.,
&
Lombardi,M.
(2016).
Human rights and quality of life domains: Identifying cross-cultural indicators.
InSchalockR. L. &
KeithK. D.(Eds.),Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability (2nd ed.,
pp.167–
174).
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
5. Fleischer,
R. J.,
&
Zamas,F.
(2011).
The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation (2nd ed.).
Temple University Press.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献