Abstract
This article analyses the figures of four contemporary Sufi peers who have established a formally unrecognized yet authoritative position despite their lack of ties to established Sufi transmission lineages or access to either symbolic or concrete capital. These peers operate in the lower strata of Delhi’s urban society, in ‘economies of despair’, composed of concentric circles of unfavourable life circumstances, limited resources, under-recognition and the deepening communal divide. Through a methodological combination of ethnography, participatory observation and textual analysis I examine their life trajectories to better understand the ways in which hyperlocal peers craft jugaad (improvised) authorities; the issue of space—the aspiration to exert power over a shrine and the transformation of the space, in some cases, from concrete to virtual. Finally, I address the transformations in peeri-mureedi relations in the neoliberal era through the prism of the consumer society.
Reference50 articles.
1. Ahmad, Imtiaz and Helmut Reifeld (eds). 2004. Lived Islam in South Asia: Adaptation, Accommodation and Conflict. Delhi: South Asia Press.
2. Aquil, Raziuddin. 2008. ‘Hazrat-I-Dehli: The Making of the Chisti Sufi Centre and the Stronghold of Islam.’ South Asia Research 28 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/026272800702800102
3. Benjamin, Solomon. 2000. ‘Governance, Economic Settings and Poverty in Bangalore’, Environment and Urbanisation, 12 (1): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780001200104
4. Blom-Hansen, Thomas. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188621
5. Brosius, Christiane. 2010. India’s Middle Class: New Forms of Urban Leisure, Consumption and Prosperity. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献