A Review of Prediction Methods for Two-Phase Pressure Loss in Mini/Micro-Channels

Abstract

Previous methods and correlations for predicting two-phase frictional pressure loss in mini/micro-channels are reviewed and compared. The empirical correlations are classified into four groups of modeling approaches: Homogeneous equilibrium models (HEMs), separated flow models (SFMs), direct empirical correlations, and flow pattern specific correlations. In order to examine the characteristics of the predictive methods for two-phase pressure loss in mini-channels and to assess the accuracy of the previous models and correlations, extensive experimental data and correlations that are available in the open literature are collected. The 1175 and 1304 experimental data for the two-phase pressure drop for condensing and boiling flows, respectively, are gathered from 15 papers and reports. The results present that the size of the channel significantly influences the pressure drop. The comparison demonstrates that Cicchitti et al.’s two-phase viscosity model is recommended for predicting two-phase pressure loss when the HEM is used. In general, the SFM with the two-phase multipliers of Muller–Steinhagen and Heck and Kim and Mudawar outperforms others for channel diameters of less than 3[Formula: see text]mm.